Paradigma Penelitian Pendidikan: Studi Kasus Mahasiswa Pendidikan Matematika di Universitas Muslim Nusantara (UMN) Al-Washliyah Tahun 2015-2016
Article Sidebar
Main Article Content
Abstract
Penelitian ini bertujuan untuk melihat paradigma penelitian, Metode, jenjang pendidikan yang diteliti di penelitian pendidikan matematika UMN AL-Washliyah tahun 2015/2016. Jenis penelitian ini yaitu penelitan kualitatif deskriptif dengan pendekatan studi literatur. Data penelitian ini diambil dari data dokumen wisudawan dan skripsi mahasiswa dari perpustakaan. Subjek penelitian ini sebanyak 167 skripsi mahasiswa pendidikan matematika yang terdiri dari perempuan 130 dan laki-laki terdiri dari 37. Hasil penelitian ini menunjukkan: (1) paradigma penelitian masih di dominasi dengan paradigma kuantitatif dan kualitatif dengan perbandingan presentasi yang hampir sama besar yaitu kuantitatif 49% serta kualitatif 47% sisanya menggunakan paradigma pengembangan sebesar 4%. Jenjang pendidikan yang paling banyak di teliti mahasiswa yaitu jenjang pendidikan SMP diikuti SMA dan SD. Kemudian desain penelitian yang paling banyak digunakan yaitu Penelitian Tindakan Kelas(PTK).
Downloads
Article Details
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
By submitting the article/manuscript of the article, the author(s) agree with this policy. No specific document sign-off is required.
1. License
The article will be governed by the Creative Commons Attribution license as currently displayed on Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License
2. Author(s)' Warranties
The author warrants that the article is original, written by stated author(s), has not been published before, contains no unlawful statements, does not infringe the rights of others, is subject to copyright that is vested exclusively in the author and free of any third party rights, and that any necessary written permissions to quote from other sources have been obtained by the author(s).
3. User Rights
JPPT's spirit is to disseminate articles published are as free as possible. Under the Creative Commons license, EJPRM permits users to copy, distribute, display, and perform the work. Users will also need to attribute authors and JPPT to distributing works in the journal and other media of publications.
4. Rights of Authors
Authors retain all their rights to the published works, such as (but not limited to) the following rights;
- Copyright and other proprietary rights relating to the article, such as patent rights,
- The right to use the substance of the article in own future works, including lectures and books,
- The right to reproduce the article for own purposes,
- The right to self-archive the article,
- The right to enter into separate, additional contractual arrangements for the non-exclusive distribution of the article's published version (e.g., post it to an institutional repository or publish it in a book), with an acknowledgment of its initial publication in this journal.
5. Co-Authorship
If the article was jointly prepared by more than one author, any authors submitting the manuscript warrants that he/she has been authorized by all co-authors to be agreed on this copyright and license notice (agreement) on their behalf, and agrees to inform his/her co-authors of the terms of this policy. JPPT will not be held liable for anything that may arise due to the author(s) internal dispute. JPPT will only communicate with the corresponding author.
6. Royalties
Being an open accessed journal and disseminating articles for free under the Creative Commons license term mentioned, author(s) aware that JPPT entitles the author(s) to no royalties or other fees.
7. Miscellaneous
JPPT will publish the article (or have it published) in the journal if the article’s editorial process is successfully completed. JPPT's editors may modify the article to a style of punctuation, spelling, capitalization, referencing and usage that deems appropriate. The author acknowledges that the article may be published so that it will be publicly accessible and such access will be free of charge for the readers as mentioned in point 3.
References
Mujib, A., Darhim., Kartasasmita, B. G. (2016). Evaluate the process of creative thinking of students in constructing mathematical proof. International Journal of Education and Research. 4(11), 287-296.
Mujib, A. (2019). Kesulitan Mahasiswa Dalam Pembuktian Matematis: Problem Matematika Diskrit. Jurnal MathEducation Nusantara, 2(1), 51-57.
Siregar, R. N., Mujib, A., Siregar, H., & Karnasih, I. (2020). Peningkatan Kemampuan Berpikir Kreatif Siswa Melalui Pendekatan Matematika Realistik. Edumaspul: Jurnal Pendidikan, 4(1), 56-62.
Sugiyono. (2017). Metode Penelitian Pendidikan Pendekatan Kuantitatif, Kualitatif, dan R & D. Bandung: Alpabeta
Wijaya, E. Y., Sudjimat, D. A., Nyoto, A., & Malang, U. N. (2016). Transformasi Pendidikan abad 21 sebagai tuntutan pengembangan sumberdaya manusia di era global. In Prosiding Seminar Nasional Pendidikan Matematika (Vol. 1, No.26, pp. 263-278)