THE EFFECTIVENESS OF PROJECT-BASED LEARNING IN RAISING TERTIARY STUDENTS' PROFICIENCY

Main Article Content

KURNIA ULFA

Abstract

English speaking proficiency is a critical skill in both academic and professional contexts, especially for English as a Foreign Language (EFL) learners. Traditional language instruction, which often emphasizes grammar and writing, frequently fails to develop learners’ speaking fluency and confidence. This study investigates the effectiveness of Project-Based Learning (PBL) in enhancing English-speaking skills among first-semester Informatics students at the tertiary level. Grounded in constructivist and communicative language teaching theories, PBL emphasizes real-world communication, collaboration, and learner autonomy. Using a descriptive method, students participated in a one-month instructional project that culminated in video presentations, assessed across five key speaking indicators: comprehension, grammar, vocabulary, pronunciation, and fluency. After a one-month PBL intervention, it was shown that 20% of students reached the highest proficiency level (score 85-90), then 55% performed at an average level (score 75-80), and 25% remained at a lower proficiency level (score 60-70). 100% of students showed improvement: high and average performers improved by 15 points on average, and low performers improved by 10 points. Results showed significant improvement across all proficiency levels, particularly among high- and average-performing students. The findings indicate that PBL effectively improves learners’ speaking abilities by promoting engagement, authentic language use, and confidence. However, lower-performing students may require additional scaffolding and support. This study supports the integration of PBL into EFL curricula to promote more interactive and meaningful language learning experiences.


 


 

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

Article Details

Section
Articles

References

Barrett, J. (2017). Pronunciation and rhythm in project-based ESL classrooms. TESOL Journal, 8(4), 635–648.

Beckett, G. H., & Slater, T. (2005). The project framework: A tool for language, content, and skills integration. ELT Journal, 59(2), 108–116. https://doi.org/10.1093/eltj/cci024

Dewey, J. (1920). Experience and education. New York: Macmillan.

Gottlieb, M. (1995). ! Pro Ject 1112ASISFEE , Evaluation. 3.

Harmer, J. (2015). The practice of English language teaching. 446. https://books.google.com/books/about/The_Practice_of_English_Language_Teachin.html?hl=id&id=Bbf2sgEACAAJ
Krajcik, J. S., & Blumenfeld, P. C. (2006). Project-based learning. In R. K. Sawyer (Ed.), The Cambridge handbook of the learning sciences (pp. 317–334). Cambridge University Press.

Larmer, J., & Mergendoller, J. R. (2010). Seven essentials for project-based learning. Educational Leadership, 68(1), 34–37.

Richards, J. C. (2008). Teaching listening and speaking: From theory to practice. Cambridge University Press.

Simpson, J., English, B. a, & Linguistics, M. a A. (2011). Integrating Project-Based Learning in an English Language Tourism Classroom in a Thai University Submitted by. Ethics, May.

Ulfa, K. (2019). Improving Computer Student ’ s Ability Through Video : Introducing Tourism Object by Speaking English. Seminar Nasional Sains & Teknologi Informasi (SENSASI), 338, 697–701.

Stoller, F. L. (2006). Establishing a theoretical foundation for project-based learning in second and foreign language contexts. In G. H. Beckett & P. C. Miller (Eds.), Project-based second and foreign language education: Past, present, and future (pp. 19–40). Information Age Publishing.

Syakur. (1987). Language Testing and Evaluation. Surakarta: Sebelas Maret University Press

Thomas, J. W. (2000). A review of research on project-based learning. The Autodesk Foundation. Retrieved from http://www.bie.org/research/study/review_of_project_based_learning_2000

Vygotsky, L. S. (1997). Educational psychology. (R. Silverman, Trans.). St. Lucie Press. (Original work published 1926)