The editor downloads the submitted articles to check the writing systematics, to ensure whether the submitted articles are in accordance with the template or not. If not or not in accordance with the existing template, the editor makes a note of corrections to the author regarding the article that does not meet the specified template criteria. The editor makes notes of the results of the corrections and then makes notes of the results of the discussion and then forwards them to the author.
After the author has revised the article, the results of the revision are sent back via the correction message in the author's account and adds information that the article has been revised. After that, the editor re-confirms whether the article is in accordance with the requested corrections, if so, the editor forwards it to the journal reviewer to be corrected in substance. The Editor will ask one scientist to review the research article manuscript. All manuscripts are subject to peer review, where the identities of reviewers and authors are hidden from each other, ensuring compliance with academic standards. After technical review, your submission will undergo an initial review by the editorial team to assess its suitability for publication in the journal. If deemed suitable, it will be submitted to one of the editors for review and decision-making. If your manuscript fits the scope and meets the criteria the editor will identify. It is also possible that the editor may determine that your manuscript does not meet the criteria or scope of the journal and should not be considered further. In such cases, the Editor will promptly notify you that the manuscript is rejected and may recommend a more appropriate journal.